18.6 C
New York

How AI is Addressing the Challenge of Minor Earthquakes

Published:

Understanding Small Earthquakes in Yellowstone: The Role of AI in Seismology

Yellowstone Caldera Chronicles is a vibrant weekly column contributed by scientists and collaborators of the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory. This week’s contribution comes from Alysha Armstrong, a graduate student at the University of Utah’s Department of Geology and Geophysics. Her insights delve into small earthquakes and the potential for artificial intelligence (AI) to revolutionize our understanding of these seismic events.

The Frequency and Significance of Small Earthquakes

Small earthquakes are far more common than their larger counterparts but often go unnoticed by the general populace. These tiny tremors serve as crucial indicators of geological processes within a region, and expanding our understanding of these seismic events can significantly enhance our knowledge of earthquake hazards. The University of Utah Seismograph Stations (UUSS) operates a network of seismometers throughout Yellowstone, continuously monitoring earthquake activity.

Challenges in Measuring Small Earthquakes

One of the major hurdles in measuring the magnitude of small earthquakes in Yellowstone is the limitations of conventional measurement methods. Each event’s magnitude is generally calculated based on the energy release detected by seismometers—data that multiple stations process independently. This approach becomes problematic in swarms of small earthquakes where the signals can overlap. As a result, some earthquakes remain unmeasured, leading to a reported magnitude of -9.99 due to insufficient data.

Enter Artificial Intelligence

Amid these challenges, the application of AI presents a promising solution. While many are familiar with advanced deep learning models like ChatGPT, seismologists are employing similar technology to analyze seismic data. These deep learning models are designed to recognize patterns within large datasets, allowing them to estimate values for new data—essentially learning from past events to improve future predictions.

Leveraging Ground Motion Data

The deep learning models utilize ground motion data as their primary input. Unlike conventional methods, which may struggle with data overlaps, these advanced models are capable of processing signals more effectively. By harnessing vast amounts of training data, the models learn to recognize various types of seismic waves, enhancing their ability to determine magnitudes even when earthquakes are unusually close to one another.

A New Approach: Machine Learning Models

In their pursuit of enhanced accuracy, UUSS scientists have developed a simpler, yet equally effective, machine learning approach. Instead of relying solely on raw seismic data, this model incorporates human-defined features—such as signal amplitude and localization—to estimate earthquake magnitudes. This technique has been shown to significantly improve the calculation of magnitudes during closely occurring seismic events.

Optimizing Available Data

For each station in the Yellowstone region, scientists have developed specialized models using data from the UUSS earthquake catalog. By taking advantage of the training phase, these models can analyze multiple seismic waves, effectively increasing the number of available measurements for calculating magnitudes. As a result, up to four times more data can be used compared to traditional methods, yielding more reliable magnitude calculations.

Complementary rather than Replacing Traditional Methods

Importantly, this state-of-the-art machine learning approach is designed to complement, rather than replace, traditional methods of magnitude calculation. Traditional methods excel in most situations but falter during small, nearby seismic events. The machine learning algorithms have their own limitations, as they are trained on specific datasets and may struggle with earthquakes that differ significantly from those examples.

Future Directions in Seismic Analysis

The collaborative nature of the UUSS models allows for predictions from various station models to be combined. This pooling of predictions can effectively filter out poor estimates. However, one significant challenge lies in assessing uncertainty—scientists aim to advance these models further to not only provide magnitude estimates but also quantify the confidence in those calculations.

The Cutting Edge of Seismology in Yellowstone

The integration of machine learning and AI techniques into the realm of seismology is at the forefront of scientific advancement. Yellowstone, with its unique geological features and heightened seismic activity, serves as an ideal laboratory for testing and refining these innovative methodologies. As researchers continue to explore the capabilities of AI, the future holds promise for significant breakthroughs in earthquake research and hazard assessment.

Related articles

Recent articles

bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 112,922.26 0.79%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 4,279.32 0.48%
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 2.86 2.17%
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.02%
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 850.22 1.24%
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 183.15 2.05%
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00 0.00%
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 4,270.71 0.40%
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.356302 0.41%
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.217658 2.19%
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.855222 2.04%
chainlink
Chainlink (LINK) $ 24.73 3.54%
wrapped-steth
Wrapped stETH (WSTETH) $ 5,173.72 0.30%
wrapped-bitcoin
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) $ 112,928.26 0.69%
hyperliquid
Hyperliquid (HYPE) $ 41.83 1.21%
wrapped-beacon-eth
Wrapped Beacon ETH (WBETH) $ 4,608.75 0.16%
stellar
Stellar (XLM) $ 0.391797 2.29%
sui
Sui (SUI) $ 3.42 2.88%
ethena-usde
Ethena USDe (USDE) $ 1.00 0.03%
wrapped-eeth
Wrapped eETH (WEETH) $ 4,588.51 0.31%
bitcoin-cash
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 560.24 0.03%
hedera-hashgraph
Hedera (HBAR) $ 0.235933 1.02%
avalanche-2
Avalanche (AVAX) $ 22.98 1.58%
weth
WETH (WETH) $ 4,281.84 0.39%
leo-token
LEO Token (LEO) $ 9.63 0.01%
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 116.19 0.28%
the-open-network
Toncoin (TON) $ 3.30 1.01%
usds
USDS (USDS) $ 0.999995 0.01%
shiba-inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB) $ 0.000012 1.32%
binance-bridged-usdt-bnb-smart-chain
Binance Bridged USDT (BNB Smart Chain) (BSC-USD) $ 0.999824 0.04%
uniswap
Uniswap (UNI) $ 10.31 1.87%
whitebit
WhiteBIT Coin (WBT) $ 42.90 0.62%
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 3.81 1.64%
coinbase-wrapped-btc
Coinbase Wrapped BTC (CBBTC) $ 112,917.25 0.79%
ethena-staked-usde
Ethena Staked USDe (SUSDE) $ 1.19 0.01%
bitget-token
Bitget Token (BGB) $ 4.73 2.40%
okb
OKB (OKB) $ 242.53 24.21%
monero
Monero (XMR) $ 265.46 0.57%
crypto-com-chain
Cronos (CRO) $ 0.143157 0.05%
aave
Aave (AAVE) $ 301.77 0.98%
pepe
Pepe (PEPE) $ 0.00001 2.41%
ethena
Ethena (ENA) $ 0.646619 0.10%
dai
Dai (DAI) $ 1.00 0.00%
mantle
Mantle (MNT) $ 1.24 3.13%
bittensor
Bittensor (TAO) $ 338.88 2.53%
ethereum-classic
Ethereum Classic (ETC) $ 21.06 1.87%
near
NEAR Protocol (NEAR) $ 2.44 3.34%
aptos
Aptos (APT) $ 4.41 0.67%
ondo-finance
Ondo (ONDO) $ 0.92118 2.22%
pi-network
Pi Network (PI) $ 0.365319 0.21%